PEOPLE v. THOMPSON

The record amply demonstrates that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered his guilty plea. (People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9.) Thereafter, in denying defendant's motion to withdraw his plea on the grounds that he was confused and intoxicated by methadone at the time it was entered, the trial court made appropriate inquiry, allowed full opportunity for comment by defendant and his counsel, and properly exercised its discretion in summarily denying defendant's motion without a hearing (People v Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Milonas, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.