Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

COLLAZO v. STATE

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan 29, 1991
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Pedro Collazo, appeals his sentence entered pursuant to the habitual offender statute, section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989). We reverse and remand.

Appellant was sentenced as a habitual offender based on two prior felony convictions. Appellant contends, and the State concedes, that the sentence was improper because the two prior convictions arose out of the same criminal episode, and were entered on the same day.

We agree. Convictions entered on the same date, arising from the same criminal episode, are treated as a single offense. Walker v. State, 567 So.2d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Taylor v. State, 558 So.2d 1092 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Lawley v. State, 556 So.2d 430 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Shead v. State, 367 So.2d 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing.