PEOPLE v. DiSALVO

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim regarding the voluntariness of his guilty plea has not been preserved for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; see also, People v Claudio, 64 N.Y.2d 858, 858-859), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

Furthermore, since the sentence imposed was in accordance with a negotiated plea agreed to by the defendant, he has no basis to now complain that his sentence is excessive (see, People v Winston, 114 A.D.2d 918; People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.