PEOPLE v. HART

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record does not support the defendant's assertion that he was not held for the action of a Grand Jury prior to his execution of a waiver of indictment (see, People v Washington, 138 A.D.2d 857). The defendant's remaining contentions are similarly without merit (see, People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.