CLARK v. CLARK

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant's contention that Supreme Court erred in making certain awards ancillary to the judgment of divorce without describing and analyzing the factors it considered (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5] [d]; [6] [a]; see also, CPLR 4213) is belied by the record, including an oral decision of the Supreme Court issued at the conclusion of the trial (cf., Kobylack v. Kobylack, 62 N.Y.2d 399). Since the defendant requests no review on the merits, none is undertaken. Kunzeman, J.P., Kooper, Harwood and O'Brien, JJ., concur.