- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
SPRADLIN v. DRENNEN CADILLAC COMPANY, INC
Supreme Court of Alabama.
Apr 11, 1991
ON REHEARING EX MERO MOTU
PER CURIAM.
The opinion of April 5, 1991, is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor:
This appeal is dismissed because the appellant has failed to submit an argument that contains the "contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes, and parts of the record relied on." See A.R.App.P. 28(a)(5) and Stephens v. Lindsey, 542 So.2d 278 (Ala. 1989).
ORIGINAL OPINION WITHDRAWN; OPINION SUBSTITUTED; DISMISSED.
HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON, ADAMS, STEAGALL and INGRAM, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.