Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BOUGHTON

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Apr 24, 1991
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Attorneys at law — Misconduct — Public reprimand — Engaging in conduct involving misrepresentation — Failure to assist in investigation.

Per Curiam.

We find that respondent committed the misconduct found by the board and concur with its recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.