ROBINSON v. AETNA LIFE CASUALTY COMPANY

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in concluding that plaintiff failed to show that "special circumstances" existed to warrant additional disclosure from defendant's medical expert (CPLR 3101 [d] [1] [iii]; Siegel, N Y Prac § 348A [2d ed 1991]; cf., Rosario v General Motors Corp., 148 A.D.2d 108; Brandes v Pettibone, Inc., 62 A.D.2d 1133).