- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
BERGER v. PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INS. CO
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Nov 7, 1991
The executors were properly denied recovery under the clear terms of defendant's supplemental insurance policy since the underinsurance clause unambiguously provides that decedent's primary underinsurance coverage would be deducted from the maximum $35,000 amount he could recover under defendant's policy (Matter of Valente v. Prudential Prop. Cas. Ins. Co., 77 N.Y.2d 894). Furthermore, defendant was not required to give notice of disclaimer since the mandatory offset provision does not relate to an exclusion or condition in the policy (Zappone v. Home Ins. Co., 55 N.Y.2d 131).
Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.