- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. ZARO
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Jan 9, 1992
The hearing court properly refused to suppress testimony of a prompt showup identification by a token booth clerk who had witnessed the robbery and gave the police a detailed and accurate description of defendant. Prompt showup identifications by witnesses following a defendant's arrest at or near the crime scene are desirable to guard against mistakes and the showup procedure employed herein certainly was not unduly suggestive (People v. Duuvon, 77 N.Y.2d 541). In any event, there was, as the court found, an independent source for the witness's in-court identification (see, People v. McMahon, 167 A.D.2d 137, 138).
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Milonas, Asch and Rubin, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.