PEOPLE v. ABDULLAH

Ordered that the sentence is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision that certain of the terms of imprisonment shall run consecutively and substituting therefor a provision that all of the terms of imprisonment shall run concurrently with one another; as so modified, the sentence is affirmed.

We find that the court erred in imposing consecutive sentences for attempted manslaughter in the first degree and for the two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree since all of the counts arose out of a single act (see, People v Day, 73 N.Y.2d 208; People v. Wilkerson, 162 A.D.2d 568; People v Kuey, 155 A.D.2d 481; Penal Law § 70.25). Mangano, P.J., Kunzeman, Eiber, O'Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.