- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
SIRACUSA v. TOMKO CARRIERS CORP
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Feb 18, 1992
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We find that the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiffs' former attorney's renewed motion. In any event, even if we were to consider the "new" information presented by the former attorney, we would conclude that the court properly awarded him 50% of the total fee. Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence and Miller, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.