- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. RODRIGUEZ
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Apr 14, 1992
There is no merit to defendant's argument that his plea was coerced, the court having accepted the plea only after it informed defendant of his various options and gave him ample opportunity to confer with counsel. Nor is there merit to defendant's argument that the sentence was harsh, given that he was charged with ten separate offenses and six separate sales of cocaine or heroin and that the 5-year minimum imposed is substantially less than the highest statutory minimum permissible under Penal Law § 70.00 (3).
Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.