MATTER OF BULGER v. N.Y. STATE BD. OF PAROLE

There is substantial evidence to support the determination of the Parole Board that petitioner had violated the conditions of his release (see, People ex rel. Walker v. Hammock, 78 A.D.2d 369, 371). More particularly, there was evidence that petitioner violated a specific condition of his parole by contacting his former girlfriend and harassing and physically threatening her, and contacting his wife.

Petitioner's attack upon the time assessment of his re-imprisonment is not a ground for relief as the Parole Board is not required to fix a date for a parole reconsideration hearing (Matter of Russo v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 N.Y.2d 69, 75).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Milonas, Ellerin and Kupferman, JJ.