FILOSA v. RAVEN-FILOSA

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant has failed to provide any evidence to demonstrate that the pendente lite awards, inter alia, of maintenance and child support constituted an improper exercise of discretion (see, Guiry v. Guiry, 159 A.D.2d 556; Chachkes v. Chachkes, 107 A.D.2d 786). Moreover, the remedy for pendente lite awards claimed to be unsatisfactory is a speedy trial at which a more detailed examination of the situation of the parties may be made (see, Erdheim v. Erdheim, 101 A.D.2d 803). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, O'Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.