PEOPLE v. HERRING

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We discern no basis for disturbing defendant's sentence (see, People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816). We have considered the defendant's arguments made in his supplemental pro se brief and find they are unpreserved for appellate review, or not supported by the record (see, People v. Pascale, 48 N.Y.2d 997; cf., People v. Brown, 45 N.Y.2d 852). Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Harwood and O'Brien, JJ., concur.