Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MCMAHON

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Sep 2, 1992
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Per Curiam.

We agree that respondent violated the Disciplinary Rules, as found by the board. We also concur with the board's recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.