- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
FLICKNER v. HUNGERFORD
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Oct 7, 1992
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Because the absentee lessor retained no control of the premises and had not agreed to keep the premises in repair, she was not responsible for the condition of the premises that caused plaintiff's injury (see, Tanoury v Cancilla, 149 A.D.2d 960).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.