Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

JACK GRAY TRANSPORT, INC. v. ERVIN

Oregon Court of Appeals.
Oct 27, 1992
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

MacColl appeals from the trial court's judgment enjoining defendant Ervin, the Multnomah County elections director, from placing a measure on the ballot that purportedly would have referred to the voters the Metropolitan Service District's award of a contract to Jack Gray Transport, Inc., for hauling solid waste. The basis for the trial court's decision was that the award of the contract was an administrative action, not a legislative one, and that it was therefore not subject to referendum.

In his first assignment of error, MacColl contends that that ruling was incorrect. We agree with the ruling. See Foster v. Clark, 309 Or. 464, 790 P.2d 1 (1990), and authorities there cited; Monahan v. Funk, 137 Or. 580, 3 P.2d 778 (1931).

The other assignment of error does not warrant discussion.

Affirmed.