PEOPLE v. YOUNG

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant's contention that the introduction of evidence of uncharged crimes constituted reversible error (see, People v Molineux, 168 N.Y. 264; see also, People v Alvino, 71 N.Y.2d 233; People v Ventimiglia, 52 N.Y.2d 350). His claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel is similarly without merit (see, People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 146).

The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.