Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

MATTER OF HURLEY v. AVON CENTRAL SCH. DIST

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Nov 18, 1992

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The court properly denied plaintiffs' motion to reargue (which was deemed a motion to renew) because plaintiffs failed to offer a valid excuse for not submitting the additional facts with the original application (see, Foley v Roche, 68 A.D.2d 558).