- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
FOERTSCH v. FOERTSCH
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Nov 23, 1992
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
No appeal lies from an order made upon reargument which adheres to the determination in an order denying a motion to resettle the decretal paragraphs of a judgment (see, Zagami v Zagami, 173 A.D.2d 698; Schanback v Schanback, 159 A.D.2d 498; Stockfield v Stockfield, 131 A.D.2d 834; Blume v Blume, 124 A.D.2d 771). Lawrence, J.P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.