- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. ROACH
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Dec 7, 1992
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
There is no merit to the defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to prove his guilt of felony murder (see also, People v Burch, 188 A.D.2d 479 [decided herewith]). Additionally, the defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that the court erred in failing to elaborate in its charge on the meaning of "forcible stealing" (see, People v Burch, supra). In any event, any error in that regard was harmless (see, People v Spencer, 188 A.D.2d 498 [decided herewith]).
We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber and Miller, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.