Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. NASS

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Dec 9, 1992

Per Curiam.

We concur in the board's findings and its recommendation. Respondent is, therefore, ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of one year, but we suspend imposition of this sanction on the condition stated by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.