- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. NASS
Supreme Court of Ohio.
Dec 9, 1992
Per Curiam.
We concur in the board's findings and its recommendation. Respondent is, therefore, ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of one year, but we suspend imposition of this sanction on the condition stated by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.