PROSPECT LEASING COMPANY v. DELASCIO

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant's sole contention on appeal, he was not entitled to vacatur of the order of attachment merely because it was rendered more than 20 days after submission of the motion therefor (see, Kaminsky v Abrams, 51 Misc.2d 5, 8). Thompson, J.P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.