PEOPLE EX REL. McCRORY v. RODRIGUEZ

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner's argument, he was not deprived of his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel at his parole revocation hearing (see generally, People ex rel. Menechino v. Warden,, 27 N.Y.2d 376).

We have examined the remaining contentions raised by the petitioner, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, and find them to be without merit (see, Teichner v. W J Holsteins, 161 A.D.2d 454; Matter of Collins v. Rodriguez, 138 A.D.2d 809; cf., People ex rel. Piccarillo v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 48 N.Y.2d 76; People ex rel. Johnson v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 180 A.D.2d 914). Mangano, P.J., Sullivan, Balletta and O'Brien, JJ., concur.