- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
STATE v. FEET
State of Louisiana v. Julius Feet, No. 92-KH-2777 (La. May 14, 1993)
Factual and Procedural Background
The relator, Julius Feet, filed applications for supervisory and/or remedial writs arising from proceedings in the Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court, Division "E", No. 139-055, which were before the Court of Appeal, First Circuit (Nos. KW92 0586, KW92 1152, KW92 1668). The opinion addresses the relator's request concerning access to the transcript of an evidentiary hearing conducted on his application for post-conviction relief. Justice Hall did not participate on the panel.
Legal Issues Presented
The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.
Arguments of the Parties
The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.
Table of Precedents Cited
No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.
Court's Reasoning and Analysis
The opinion is formatted as a short order. The Court granted the relator's application and ordered the district court to produce a copy of the transcript of the evidentiary hearing on the relator's application for post-conviction relief and to furnish this Court with a copy of its compliance. No expanded legal analysis or reasoning appears in the text provided.
Holding and Implications
GRANTED.
Holding (direct effect): The district court is ordered to provide the relator with a copy of the transcript of the evidentiary hearing on his application for post-conviction relief and to provide this Court with a copy of its compliance with that order.
Implications: The decision's immediate consequence is the district court's obligation to produce the transcript and notify the Supreme Court of compliance. The opinion does not set out broader legal holdings or precedent.
Granted. The district court is ordered to provide the relator with a copy of the transcript of the evidentiary hearing conducted on his application for post conviction relief. In addition, the district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its compliance with this order.
HALL, J., not on panel.
Alert