TERCEIRA v. TERCEIRA

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the best remedy for the perceived inequities in the pendente lite award is a speedy trial at which the disputed issues as to the financial capacity and circumstances of the parties can be fully explored (see, Mulcahy v Mulcahy, 170 A.D.2d 587; Marohn v Marohn, 157 A.D.2d 771; Frankel v Frankel, 150 A.D.2d 520). Thompson, J.P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.