- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
HIRSCHFELD v. STAHL
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Jun 10, 1993
Disqualification of counsel rests in the sound discretion of the court, and here there has been no showing of abuse (see, Schmidt v. Magnetic Head Corp., 101 A.D.2d 268, 277). It cannot be said that the past matters and the instant matter are "completely unrelated" (Macro Cash Carry Corp. v. Berkman, 81 A.D.2d 783, 784).
Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Ross, Kassal and Nardelli, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.