- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. ROSADO
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Jun 22, 1993
Since the complainant's testimony that defendant robbed her satisfied the additional proof requirement of CPL 60.50, the trial court's supplemental instructions that defendant could be convicted solely upon her admission of guilt at trial was not reversible error (People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230), assuming, without deciding, that such requirement of additional proof should have been charged.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Asch and Rubin, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.