PEOPLE v. MACK

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the police officer's testimony at the suppression hearing was inherently incredible and patently tailored to meet constitutional objections is based upon mere conjecture. Therefore, the findings of the hearing court as to the police officer's credibility will not be disturbed (see, People v. Concepcion, 38 N.Y.2d 211; People v. Ennis, 158 A.D.2d 467; People v. Villa, 156 A.D.2d 402; People v. Garafolo, 44 A.D.2d 86). Mangano, P.J., Rosenblatt, O'Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.