- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
N. ALA. EXPRESS v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMM
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Jun 30, 1993
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
PER CURIAM:
The following sentence is withdrawn from our opinion in this case:
For instance, the ICC could not approve the transfer of intrastate routes in Alabama if the only other aspects of the transaction involved interstate routes between Oregon and California.
North Alabama Exp., Inc. v. I.C.C., 971 F.2d 661, 665 (11th Cir. 1992). Otherwise, the petitions for rehearing filed by respondent Interstate Commerce Commission and intervening respondent Averitt Express, Inc. are denied.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.