CROCKETT v. STATE

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial. We agree with appellant that the trial court failed to make a sufficient inquiry concerning the apparent conflict of interest of appellant's counsel in his representation of appellant as well as a prosecution witness. See DeArce v. State, 405 So.2d 283 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

DELL, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.