- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. KING
Supreme Court of Ohio.
Sep 8, 1993
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Per Curiam.
We adopt the findings of fact and recommendations of the board. Respondent, Barry King, is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxes to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.