- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
THOMA v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 15, 1993
The plaintiffs Barbara Thoma and Theodore W. Dean's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 31 Conn. App. 643 (AC 11524), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (a) Canterbury Zoning Regulation 4.12.3 requires, as a condition precedent to subdivision approval, inland wetlands approval; and (b) the zoning regulation conflicts with General Statutes 8-26?"
Angela Hawkins Fichter, in support of the petition.
Edward E. Moukawsher, in opposition.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.