- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. BATISTA
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Oct 21, 1993
The hearing court properly found the police had probable cause to arrest defendant (see, People v. McRay, 51 N.Y.2d 594, 602). The arresting officer testified that he had heard specified details of defendant's description broadcast over the radio, and that she matched that description (see, People v. Lypka, 36 N.Y.2d 210, 213-214; People v. Petralia, 62 N.Y.2d 47, 51-52; compare, People v. Brodie, 87 A.D.2d 653 [2d Dept]). This testimony was sufficient to conclude that defendant's arrest was based on probable cause.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Ellerin, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.