- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. WASHINGTON
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Oct 25, 1993
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that he was prejudiced by the prosecutor's summation is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v. Medina, 53 N.Y.2d 951; People v. Burrell, 178 A.D.2d 422; People v. Bryant, 163 A.D.2d 406; People v. Bruen, 136 A.D.2d 648). In any event, we find that the prosecutor's summation did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial (see, People v. Roopchand, 107 A.D.2d 35, affd 65 N.Y.2d 837).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Eiber and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.