DUFFY v. HOLT-HARRIS

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The plaintiff's motion, denominated as a motion for leave to renew, was, in actuality, a motion to reargue. No appeal lies from the denial of reargument. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed (see, McElroy v Guida, 196 A.D.2d 859). Sullivan, J.P., Lawrence, O'Brien and Santucci, JJ., concur.