PEOPLE v. MARTINEZ

The defendant after proper colloquy waived his right to appeal. It was voluntary, knowing and intelligent (see, People v Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1; see also, People v Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273).

The sentencing court properly imposed consecutive sentences; the crimes committed here involved separate acts committed with the requisite criminal intent (see, People v Day, 73 N.Y.2d 208, 212; see also, People ex rel. Gallo v Warden, 32 A.D.2d 1051).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Ross and Nardelli, JJ.