Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

CITY OF MELBOURNE v. PUMA

Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb 3, 1994
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

No. 81652.

Attorney(S)

Paul R. Gougelman and Michael R. Riemenschneider of Reinman, Harrell, Graham, Mitchell Wattwood, P.A., Melbourne, for petitioner. Ralph Geilich, Melbourne, for respondent. Sherry A. Spiers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Jonathan A. Glogau, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs, Tallahassee, amicus curiae for Florida Dept. of Community Affairs and Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., State of Fla. Nancy Stuparich, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Jane C. Hayman, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, amicus curiae for Florida League of Cities, Inc. Eden Bentley, Asst. County Atty., Melbourne, amicus curiae for Brevard County. John J. Copelan, Jr., County Atty. for Broward County, and Barbara S. Monahan, Asst. County Atty., Fort Lauderdale, amicus curiae for Broward County.

JUDGES

PER CURIAM.

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review City of Melbourne v. Puma, 616 So.2d 190 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). Jurisdiction was initially accepted based on conflict among district courts of appeal. We find that our recent decision in Board of County Commissioners v. Snyder, 627 So.2d 469 (Fla. 1993), resolves the conflict. Accordingly, we remand this case to the court below for further consideration consistent with our opinion in Snyder.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x