- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
MATTER OF BARENHOLTZ
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Feb 8, 1994
The Surrogate had the power to impose the interim relief and acted within her discretion in doing so, since the facts brought to her attention in the petition and affidavits of the beneficiaries included sufficient allegations of both waste and the willful violation of a prior court order (SCPA 711, [3]; 712, 719 [10]). However, we view the time limits imposed by the interim order of this Court dated September 22, 1993 (Sullivan, J.) to be more appropriate and modify accordingly.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Asch, Rubin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.