Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

MARINE MIDLAND BANK v. RAMLEH ENTERPRISES

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Mar 7, 1994
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

This foreclosure action arises from the appellants' default on a real estate acquisition and development loan given by the plaintiff. During a pre-trial settlement conference before the court, this action was purportedly settled for $2,600,000, with the appellants agreeing to pay the plaintiff within 90 days from execution of a written stipulation. However, there was no record made of the purported settlement. After the settlement conference, the appellants failed to respond to a motion to dismiss their affirmative defenses and counterclaims, and the court granted that relief.

Contrary to the appellants' contention, there is insufficient evidence that a final settlement agreement was ever reached in open court (see, CPLR 2104; Matter of Dolgin Eldert Corp., 31 N.Y.2d 1). At the very least, an oral agreement made in open court "must be entered in the minute book of such a proceeding" (Kalomiris v. County of Nassau, 121 A.D.2d 367, 368). Here, there is a dispute that full agreement had been reached and no entry reflecting a settlement was made in the minute book; therefore, it was proper for the Supreme Court to deny the appellants' cross motion for enforcement (see, Matter of Dolgin Eldert Corp., 31 N.Y.2d 1, 10-11, supra; see also, Zambrana v. Memnon, 181 A.D.2d 730).

There is no merit to the appellants' remaining contentions. Sullivan, J.P., Joy, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.