Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

NIPPER v. SMITH

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Mar 10, 1994
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

No. 92-2588.

Attorney(S)

Brenda Wright, Washington DC, Robert B. McDuff, Jackson, MS, Denise M. Prescod, Jacksonville, FL, Mitchell F. Dolin, Washington, DC, Sherrilyn A. Ifill, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants. George L. Wass, Harry F. Chiles, Denis Dean, Dept. of Legal Affairs, Tallahassee, FL, Frank E. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leonard S. Magid, Jacksonville, FL, Mitchell D. Franks, Lakeland, FL, for defendants-appellees. Rebecca K. Troth, Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Div., Appellate Section, Washington, DC, Howard C. Coker, Coker, Myers, Schickel, Cooper Sorenson Jacksonville, FL, for U.S.

JUDGES

Gerald Bard Tjoflat

Phyllis A. Kravitch

Joseph Woodrow Hatchett

Robert Lanier Anderson

James Larry Edmondson

Emmett Ripley Cox

Stanley F. Birch

Joel Fredrick Dubina

Susan Harrell Black

Edward Earl Carnes

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion September 15, 1993, 11th Cir., 1993, 1 F.3d 1171)

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x