- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
CONSUMERS DISTRIB. v. BAKER PROTECTIVE SERV
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Mar 22, 1994
We agree with the IAS Court that the failure of defendant's employee on two occasions to respond to a signal indicating a possible burglary despite hourly noise reminders, while clearly ordinary negligence, was not gross negligence, i.e, "conduct that evinces a reckless disregard for the rights of others or `smacks' of intentional wrongdoing" (Colnaghi, U.S.A. v. Jewelers Protection Servs., 81 N.Y.2d 821, 823-824, quoting Sommer v Federal Signal Corp., 79 N.Y.2d 540, 554), and that the contract clause limiting defendant's liability from its own negligence is therefore enforceable (compare, Stuart Rudnick, Inc. v. Jewelers Protection Servs., 194 A.D.2d 317).
Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Kupferman, Rubin and Williams, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.