- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
MILLER v. IRWIN
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Mar 29, 1994
The testimony of plaintiff's attorney that he personally reserved the summons and complaint at a deposition satisfied plaintiff's burden of establishing proper service by a preponderance of the credible evidence (see, Powell v. Powell, 114 A.D.2d 443). We find no reason to disturb the IAS Court's findings crediting the testimony of plaintiff's attorney and discrediting the contrary testimony of defendant.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Carro, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.