Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

ADVANCED ORTHO-TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. ORTHOSPEC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Apr 4, 1994
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiff's motion is denied.

In order to vacate a dismissal of a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3404, the plaintiff must show a reasonable excuse for the delay, lack of prejudice to the adversary, a meritorious cause of action, and lack of intention to abandon (see, Gray v Sandoz Pharms., 158 A.D.2d 583). The plaintiff failed to meet this burden.

The asserted illness of the plaintiff's attorney was not a reasonable excuse because the attorney submitted no medical records to support his claim, and, in any event, there were associate counsel available (see, Prezio v Milanese, 40 A.D.2d 910). Nor did the plaintiff show a meritorious cause of action, because it did not submit an affidavit by a party with knowledge, and the affidavit of the plaintiff's attorney was unacceptable hearsay (see, e.g., Matter of Kharrubi v Board of Educ., 133 A.D.2d 457). Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.