Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. ZELKE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Apr 15, 1994
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant entered an Alford plea (see, North Carolina v Alford, 400 U.S. 25) to a lesser offense than those crimes charged in the indictment. There is no merit to defendant's contention that the factual basis for that plea was insufficient (see, People v Alfieri, 201 A.D.2d 935; People v Myers, 151 A.D.2d 1002, lv denied 74 N.Y.2d 815). Likewise without merit is the contention that defendant's sentence is harsh or excessive. It was agreed that the sentence for the class C felony to which defendant pleaded would include a term of imprisonment not to exceed 2 1/3 to 7 years and that such term would run concurrently with whatever sentence was imposed on a pending misdemeanor conviction. Defendant was sentenced to an indeterminate term of 2 1/3 to 7 years in accordance with the plea bargain. Having obtained the benefit of that bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms (see, People v Felman, 141 A.D.2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 918).