FARMER v. DAVIDSON

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the determination of the Supreme Court that the defendants did not direct or control the manner in which the injured plaintiff worked on their one-family home. Therefore, they are exempt from liability pursuant to Labor Law §§ 240 and 241 (see, Duda v Rouse Constr. Corp., 32 N.Y.2d 405; Schwartz v Foley, 142 A.D.2d 635; see also, Danish v Kennedy, 168 A.D.2d 768; Reyes v Silfies, 168 A.D.2d 979). Miller, J.P., Lawrence, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.