DELMAN v. MISK

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the provision in the order which conditioned the vacatur of the default judgments on the deposit of security with the court was not inconsistent with the oral decision rendered by the court following the traverse hearing (cf., Green v. Morris, 156 A.D.2d 331).

We have reviewed the defendant's remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Sullivan, J.P., Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.