- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
STATE v. HOPKINS
Oregon Court of Appeals.
Jul 5, 1994
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified; affirmed.
RICHARDSON, C.J.
The state moves for reconsideration, ORAP 6.25, of our opinion in State v. Hopkins, 127 Or. App. 1, 870 P.2d 849 (1994), in which we addressed defendant's unpreserved error regarding his post-prison supervision term and remanded for resentencing. The state argues that we should not have reached that error and cites, inter alia, State v. Slawson, 123 Or. App. 573, 860 P.2d 876 (1993). Defendant's error is unpreserved and we agree with the state that, under the rationale of Slawson, we should not have addressed it. Accordingly, we modify our opinion to withdraw our discussion of that error and affirm.
Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified; affirmed.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.